THINKSELF
çddf,faa,afa,aaf,faf,ffa,aff

¢  SOCIAL RANK OF THE SCENE FELLOWS.
³         by Pearl / Parasite

²Peace,love....
¹
All  of  us  scene-freaks,  are always
willing  to accept newcommers, because
there  is  a  great  diffrence between
lamers   and   newcommers(If   I  have
understood  the debate on this subject
right!)  And  ofcause  we all love the
diskmags;   talking   spheres  of  the
scene,  the  WHOLE  scene.  And if you
have  anything  on  your mind the only
thing you have to do, is grab a editor
and  start  writing.  Because you know
that  people  read  your  articles and
then,  for  them  self, make their own
oppinions   about   your   article  or
subject.   The  only  ones  who  MIGHT
would  react  on your article is USUAL
main  or  full  time editors of a mag,
that  they  have  to  make  survive by
writing  lotsa'  articles.  Isn't that
kind  of a shame, that the scene folks
are so apathic?!

But  belive  me  they(or we) arn't, it
all depends where YOU (the author) are
in   the   scene-heracy.    There  are
diffrent  levels  of  how much you can
say.  For example if you is an unknown
guy  from  an  unknown  crew, the most
active  you  is  "alloved" to write in
the  mags, are supplements to allready
exiting  debates.   (ehh, I think that
packs  and  mags is okay) and then you
can  move  further;  Lord  Helmet  for
example  is  one,  if  not  the,  most
¶popular  editor in the scene, and look
how  every  time  he  write an serious
article  or  speak a word idt becommes
law.   Now  he is "untouchable", witch
means  that  he "piss" on many people,
and  say  what  he  really mean (plus,
ofcause  abit  show, and dirty words),
he started the Anti-Brainstrom article
storm  etc.  No one dare to anwser him
again,  and  are  afraid of comming in
his  spotlight.   Because  HE  got the
POWER, the POWER of information.  (All
information    should    be   free   -
Cyberpunk)  What  i'm really trying to
say  with  this little article is that
if  any unknowns was half as offending
as,  again  for an example Helmet, the
whole  scene would have exploded.  And
the  "victims"  would  have  been  the
first  to  write  articles  and spread
rumors  that  the  person is lame etc.
And  that  could MIGHT meaning the end
of an scene-carrier even before it has
really started.

You     can    also    see    it    in
rewiev-sections; If the rewiever ain't
a  editor  whom  are perfectly sure of
him  self,  he is abit scared to write
that   this  very  well  known  groups
production,  is  rather  lame.  But if
the  author  is sequre on him self and
have "covered his bag", then he try to
be  as  objective  as possible, and he
don't  really  care  if the group (the
well  known  group!)  should  make  an
officiel  "war".   (Witch almost don't
happen  when,  a writer is sure on him
self.  And really try to be objective)

¶The  point  of  this  article  is both
that,  there  are  levels for what you
can  say,  and  when  you  can say it!
WHY?   DO  WE  REALLY NEED THAT?!  And
that we all maybe should be more awake
on  what  diskmags  really  is:   Huge
spaces  filled  with  information  and
news,  but when and who can really see
if  this  socalled News or information
is   Propaganda?    It  can  be  hard,
right?!

So  I  would  like  if,  not  only the
well-etablished  authors would dare to
write articles witch consern more than
just:   I  think packs and...  And all
of  us,  should think for ourselfs and
NOT  let  the  diskmags decide what we
should   mean.    I   hope   you   all
understood,  what  I tried to say, and
will give it a thourgt!